Woman holding insurance claim check and contract with partner standing beside her against city skyline at sunset

Love Insurance Pays Off: Woman Collects $1,400 After 10-Year Romance

At a Glance

  • A Chinese woman who bought a discounted “love insurance” policy in 2016 has collected about $1,400 after marrying her designated partner.
  • The payout equals roughly 50 times the original premium of 199 yuan (about $28).
  • The couple, who wed in October 2025, chose cash over 10,000 roses and are still deciding how to spend the money.

Why it matters: The story shows how a scrapped financial product can still deliver real money-and a romantic twist-years after regulators outlawed it.

A decade after purchasing what many dismissed as a marketing gimmick, a Chinese woman surnamed Wu has proven that “love insurance” can pay real dividends. She and her new husband, surnamed Wang, recently walked away with a $1,400 cash payout, validating a 2016 impulse buy that cost her only $28.

The 2016 Purchase

Wu bought the policy as a light-hearted gift for Wang while they were university students. China Life Property and Casualty Insurance Company Limited had discounted the plan from 299 yuan to 199 yuan, dangling either 10,000 roses, a ring, or cash if the couple married within the policy window. Wu paid the reduced premium and designated Wang as her partner, locking in the terms for what both assumed was a novelty product.

Wang’s first reaction was suspicion. “She said she bought love insurance; my first reaction was that she had been scammed,” he told the South China Morning Post. The couple filed the paperwork away and continued dating, giving little thought to the policy’s long-term value.

A Decade-Long Romance

Wu and Wang met in secondary school and began dating in university. Ten years after buying the policy, they married in October 2025, making them eligible to claim the benefit. They submitted their marriage certificate to the insurer and chose the cash option over the mountain of roses.

Romantic couple embracing with roses and university books showing their decade-long love journey

“The wedding is already over. I would not know how to preserve 10,000 roses,” Wu explained. Wang added that they will “decide what to do when the money arrives,” leaving the door open for anything from a honeymoon upgrade to a joint investment.

Regulatory Backdrop

While the payout feels like a win for romantics, the product no longer exists. Chinese regulators phased out “love insurance” plans after ruling that romance does not constitute a legitimate, legally insurable interest. Standard insurance must protect against measurable risks tied to health, property, or liability-not emotional outcomes. Because Wu’s policy was issued before the 2017 ban, the company honored the contract, making the couple’s claim one of the last successful redemptions of its kind.

Key Numbers

Metric Value
Original premium 199 yuan (about $28)
Face-value options 10,000 roses or 10,000 yuan cash
Cash payout About $1,400
Return multiple Roughly 50× the premium

The couple’s windfall underscores how an obsolete financial instrument can still deliver tangible rewards if the timing-and the relationship-lasts long enough.

Key Takeaways

  • A defunct “love insurance” policy bought for $28 matured into a $1,400 payday after the couple wed within the required timeframe.
  • Regulators outlawed such products in 2017, but existing policies remain valid, giving early buyers a rare shot at a romantic return on investment.
  • Choosing cash over 10,000 roses simplified logistics and left the newlyweds free to allocate the money however they wish.

Author

  • My name is Jonathan P. Miller, and I cover sports and athletics in Los Angeles.

    Jonathan P. Miller is a Senior Correspondent for News of Los Angeles, covering transportation, housing, and the systems that shape how Angelenos live and commute. A former urban planner, he’s known for clear, data-driven reporting that explains complex infrastructure and development decisions.

Comments

No comments yet. Why don’t you start the discussion?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *