Introduction
Prince Harry, the Duke of Sussex, has publicly defended NATO’s role in Afghanistan after President Donald Trump suggested that allies stayed “a little back” from the frontlines. The former royal’s response, delivered through his spokesperson on January 23, 2026, highlights the decade-long military service he has spent in the British Army and the personal losses he endured.
At a Glance
- Prince Harry rebuts Trump’s NATO claim, citing 457 UK fatalities in Afghanistan.
- Trump’s comment came during a Fox News interview on January 22, 2026.
- The Duke emphasizes the shared defense commitment of Article 5 after 9/11.
- Why it matters: The exchange underscores the continuing relevance of the UK’s military legacy and the political sensitivities surrounding former royals speaking on foreign policy.
Trump’s NATO Question
During a Fox News interview on January 22, 2026, President Trump asked whether NATO allies would “be there” if the United States “ever needed them.” He added:
> “We have never really asked anything of them. You know, they’ll say they sent some troops to Afghanistan, or this or that. And they did – they stayed a little back, a little off the front lines.”
The comment implied that NATO’s contribution was limited, sparking immediate backlash from military veterans and political leaders.
Harry’s Response
Through his spokesperson, Prince Harry issued a statement the next day that reaffirmed the UK’s commitment to the alliance:
> “In 2001, NATO invoked Article 5 for the first-and only-time in history. It meant that every allied nation was obliged to stand with the United States in Afghanistan, in pursuit of our shared security. Allies answered that call.”
He continued:
> “I served there. I made lifelong friends there. And I lost friends there. The United Kingdom alone had 457 service personnel killed.”
Harry also reflected on the broader human cost:
> “Thousands of lives were changed forever. Mothers and fathers buried sons and daughters. Children were left without a parent. Families are left carrying the cost. Those sacrifices deserve to be spoken about truthfully and with respect, as we all remain united and loyal to the defence of diplomacy and peace.”
His remarks were aimed at correcting what he saw as a mischaracterization of the UK’s sacrifices and the alliance’s collective responsibility.
Reactions from UK Politicians
British Prime Minister Keir Starmer joined the chorus of criticism, calling Trump’s claim “insulting and frankly appalling.” Starmer’s comment reinforced the view that the former royal’s statement was not only a defense of the UK’s military record but also a broader statement about national dignity.
Royal Family Context
Prince Harry stepped back from his working role within the royal family in 2020 and relocated to the United States with Meghan Markle, where they now raise their two children. Although members of the royal family traditionally avoid public commentary on political issues, Harry has continued to speak out on military service and veterans’ welfare.
The Duke’s willingness to address NATO’s role marks a departure from the usual restraint exercised by royals in political matters. It also highlights the personal nature of his involvement, as he has lived and worked in Afghanistan for two tours.
Potential US State Visit
The conversation about NATO and the UK’s military service has coincided with reports that King Charles, 77, is expected to make a state visit to the United States in April 2026. The Telegraph and The Times have reported that discussions are underway and that the trip is considered “highly likely.”
This potential visit underscores the continuing diplomatic ties between the UK and the US, and it may serve as a backdrop for further discussions about the alliance’s future and the legacy of the Afghanistan conflict.
Key Takeaways
- Trump’s Fox News interview on January 22, 2026 suggested NATO allies stayed “back” during Afghanistan.
- Prince Harry, who served two tours in Afghanistan, countered that the UK suffered 457 fatalities and that NATO’s Article 5 commitment was upheld.
- UK political leaders, including Prime Minister Keir Starmer, condemned Trump’s remarks.
- The Duke’s comments reflect his ongoing advocacy for veterans and illustrate the delicate balance royals maintain when addressing political subjects.
- A forthcoming UK-US state visit may provide a platform for further dialogue on NATO and the legacy of the Afghanistan war.
Conclusion
Prince Harry’s rebuttal to President Trump’s NATO comments brings the UK’s military history and the alliance’s collective responsibilities back into the public eye. As the world watches the potential UK-US state visit, the conversation about shared defense commitments and the human cost of conflict remains more relevant than ever.
