Court Denies Ronnie Radke’s Restraining Order Against Brittany Furlan

Court Denies Ronnie Radke’s Restraining Order Against Brittany Furlan

> At a Glance

> – Ronnie Radke’s request for a temporary restraining order against Brittany Furlan was denied by the court

> – Furlan claims she was catfished by someone pretending to be Radke, while he claims she harassed him

> – A hearing is set for January 23 in Los Angeles

> – Why it matters: The case highlights the legal complexities of online impersonation and social media harassment claims

Months after Brittany Furlan claimed she was catfished by someone pretending to be Ronnie Radke, the musician filed a restraining order request against her, alleging harassment from both Furlan and her husband Tommy Lee.

The Legal Battle

Radke filed the request on January 5, which was subsequently denied by the court. However, a hearing is scheduled for January 23 in Los Angeles, according to Furlan’s attorney and documents obtained by News Of Los Angeles.

The conflict began in May when Furlan alleged on social media that she’d been “seduced” by someone on Snapchat claiming to be Radke. The Falling in Reverse frontman denied ever meeting Furlan and claimed he’d been threatened by Lee over the situation.

The Allegations

In his petition, Radke stated that despite not knowing Furlan personally, she has:

  • Contacted him multiple times on social media
  • Showed up to his doctor’s appointment without an appointment
  • Waited and stared at him
  • Harassed him constantly online

Radke also claimed Furlan “will not stop posting false public claims about me and messaging underage fans to coerce them into lying about me.” He requested the court order her to stay 100 yards away from him.

The Response

Furlan’s attorney issued a strong statement to News Of Los Angeles:

> “Ms. Furlan is offended to find out this petition was filed because the only victim of harassment is her. We will take all legal measures to defend against this frivolous lawsuit and request that Ms. Furlan be protected from further harassment and threats by the petitioner.”

Radke included screenshots in his filing, including Instagram DMs from Lee that read: “Watch your back!.. Don’t f— with me dude!”

Furlan’s Side of the Story

In a TikTok video posted in May, Furlan explained her perspective:

> “[Radke] says this isn’t him. That’s fine, whatever. I don’t give a f—. It’s a catfish, cool. I got catfished. Why are you still harassing me? Why are you sending me hundreds of messages? Why are you trolling me? I don’t give a f—. I unfollowed you. Leave me alone. That’s it.”

She admitted she’d exchanged Snapchat messages with someone she believed was Radke during a “tough time” in her marriage to Lee, whom she married in 2019. She also stated she’d “come clean” to Lee about the situation.

Current Status

reverses

Despite the drama, Furlan and Lee appear to have reconciled. The couple celebrated their birthdays together in the fall and spent the recent holidays as a couple. In September, Furlan shared videos supporting Mötley Crüe at their Las Vegas residency, including footage of her kissing Lee.

On New Year’s Eve, Lee posted: “Wishing you all the happiest of the New Year 2026. Tommy & Brittany Lee.”

Key Takeaways

  • Ronnie Radke’s restraining order request against Brittany Furlan was denied, but a hearing is set for January 23
  • Furlan claims she was catfished by someone impersonating Radke on Snapchat
  • Radke alleges Furlan has harassed him online and showed up at his doctor’s appointment
  • Furlan’s attorney claims she is actually the victim of harassment in this situation
  • Despite the conflict, Furlan and husband Tommy Lee appear to have reconciled

The case continues to unfold as both parties prepare for the upcoming court hearing.

Author

  • My name is Jonathan P. Miller, and I cover sports and athletics in Los Angeles.

    Jonathan P. Miller is a Senior Correspondent for News of Los Angeles, covering transportation, housing, and the systems that shape how Angelenos live and commute. A former urban planner, he’s known for clear, data-driven reporting that explains complex infrastructure and development decisions.

Comments

No comments yet. Why don’t you start the discussion?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *