> At a Glance
> – Matt Kalil filed a $75,000+ lawsuit on Jan. 6 claiming Haley Kalil’s Twitch stream about their sex life caused him public humiliation
> – Haley told viewers his penis size was the “biggest factor” in their 2015-2022 divorce
> – Her lawyers call the suit “legally unsupported” and vow to dismiss it, citing First Amendment concerns
> – Why it matters: The case tests how far public figures can go when discussing past relationships online
A former Minnesota Vikings offensive tackle is taking his influencer ex-wife to court over candid bedroom revelations she made during a November Twitch livestream.
The Lawsuit
Matt Kalil, 36, argues that Haley Kalil, 33, crossed the line when she told streamer Marlon Garcia that intimacy with her ex was “impossible” and compared his anatomy to “two Coke cans on top of each other, maybe even a third.”
The Jan. 6 filing-obtained by TMZ-claims those comments sparked:
- Unwanted public attention toward Matt
- Disturbing messages to his 2024 bride, Keilani Asmus
- Family embarrassment as the clip circulated
Matt says Haley profited from the traffic bump, gaining “substantial financial benefit, increased viewership, increased engagement and monetization.”
Haley’s Defense
Haley’s attorney, Matthew Bialick, calls the complaint baseless:
> “The claims seek to dramatically expand existing law and establish damaging new precedent by imposing liability on a woman for merely speaking openly and truthfully about a prior relationship.”
Haley adds that the full livestream-still on Garcia’s YouTube-shows she “speaks highly of him in multiple ways.”
> “I was genuinely shocked and incredibly hurt upon receiving the news of this filing,” she told News Of Los Angeles.
What She Actually Said
During the two-hour stream, Haley typed on her phone rather than voicing the detail, then showed the screen to Garcia:
| Claim Streamed | Haley’s Words |
|---|---|
| Size issue | “Dead ass, for our whole marriage, dead ass!” |
| Attempted fixes | “therapist, doctors… lipo-type s—“ |
| Outcome | “No. Because he was like 0.01% of the population” |
She concluded: “That was the biggest factor” in the split.
Key Takeaways
- Matt wants a jury trial and damages above $75,000
- Haley’s team pledges an immediate dismissal motion
- Both parties are public figures, raising First Amendment flags
- The clip remains online, keeping the allegations in circulation
The dispute spotlights the collision of social-media candor, post-divorce grievances, and reputation in the digital age.
