McDonald’s Sued Over McRib’s ‘No Rib’ Pork Patty

McDonald’s Sued Over McRib’s ‘No Rib’ Pork Patty

At a Glance

  • A class-action suit claims the McRib contains no rib meat
  • Plaintiffs say McDonald’s uses lower-grade pork cuts like shoulder, heart, stomach
  • The $7.89 sandwich’s name is called a “deliberate sleight of hand”
  • Why it matters: If certified, anyone who bought a McRib in the past four years could join the suit

A December 23 complaint filed in Illinois federal court accuses McDonald’s of duping McRib fans by selling a rib-shaped sandwich that allegedly contains zero rib meat.

What’s in the McRib?

The suit says internal cuts-pork shoulder, heart and scalded stomach-are ground into the patty, not traditional rib meat. Plaintiffs argue that rib meat is viewed as a “premium” cut, yet the McRib is “among the most expensive individual” items, reaching $7.89 in some stores.

Company website lists the item as “seasoned boneless pork” and calls the meat a “pork patty.”

McDonald’s Response

McDonald’s told News Of Los Angeles:

> “This lawsuit distorts the facts and many of the claims are inaccurate. Food quality and safety are at the heart of everything we do – that’s why we’re committed to using real, quality ingredients across our entire menu. Our fan-favorite McRib sandwich is made with 100% pork sourced from farmers and suppliers across the U.S. We’ve always been transparent about our ingredients so guests can make the right choice for them.”

Legal Claims

Sixteen separate counts are lodged, including:

responds
  • Fraudulent misrepresentation
  • Fraudulent omission
  • Breach of contract
  • Consumer-protection violations in California, Illinois, New York and Washington, D.C.

Limited-Time Strategy

Since its 1981 debut, the McRib has returned sporadically. The suit claims the on-again, off-again schedule “discourages deep consumer scrutiny” and prolongs confusion over its contents.

Region McRib Status
Chicago Available now
Miami Available now
Dallas Available now
St. Louis Available now
Atlanta Available now
Seattle Available now
Los Angeles Available now

Who Can Join?

Plaintiffs seek class certification covering anyone who purchased a McRib in the four years before the December 23 filing. They want damages, restitution and a court order barring the alleged deceptive ads.

Key Takeaways

  • The suit targets the McRib’s name and shape, claiming they imply rib meat that isn’t there
  • McDonald’s insists it uses “100% pork” and has been transparent
  • If the class is certified, potential damages could reach back to 2019 purchases
  • The sandwich is again available for a limited, but unspecified, period

The case continues while McDonald’s keeps the seasonal favorite on select menus nationwide.

Author

  • My name is Olivia M. Hartwell, and I cover the world of politics and government here in Los Angeles.

    Olivia M. Hartwell covers housing, development, and neighborhood change for News of Los Angeles, focusing on who benefits from growth and who gets pushed out. A UCLA graduate, she’s known for data-driven investigations that follow money, zoning, and accountability across LA communities.

Comments

No comments yet. Why don’t you start the discussion?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *